The Times’ odd take on Dylan’s place as one of the ‘Greatest Living American Songwriters’

Bob Dylan and his band. Photo (cc) 2012 by Adrian Lasso.

Well, of course Bob Dylan deserves to be among The New York Times’ “30 Greatest Living American Songwriters.” He could stand all by himself. But that doesn’t mean I don’t have a few bones to pick.

First, Dylan’s “five essential songs” includes “Isis,” which is a good but not great song. More to the point, he had a co-writer on that one — Jacques Levy, whom Dylan employed as a lyricist on his 1976 “Desire” album. Of the hundreds of truly essential songs that Dylan has written over the past 60 years, why would the Times choose one on which he had substantial help with the lyrics?

Second, Jody Rosen, who wrote the Dylan essay, points to the so-so “Don’t Fall Apart on Me Tonight,” from the B-plus “Infidels” album (1983), as an example of his sense of humor:

It’s like I’m stuck inside a painting that’s hanging in the Louvre
My throat starts to tickle and my nose itches, but I know that I can’t move

You want museums and humor? How about this, from “Visions of Johanna”?

Inside the museums, infinity goes up on trial
Voices echo this is what salvation must be like after a while
But Mona Lisa musta had the highway blues
You can tell by the way she smiles
See the primitive wallflower freeze
When the jelly-faced women all sneeze
Hear the one with the mustache say, “Jeez, I can’t find my knees”

That’s from 1966’s “Blonde and Blonde,” a top-five Dylan album (or top three; or best ever), which isn’t even represented in the Times’ list of essentials. Nor is his acoustic period, which many admirers still regard as his greatest. Now, I’m mainly a fan of Dylan the rocker, but it’s hard to imagine how “Chimes of Freedom” didn’t make it in here. He could have won the Nobel Prize for that alone. Consider:

Through the mad mystic hammering of the wild ripping hail
The sky cracked its poems in naked wonder
That the clinging of the church bells blew far into the breeze
Leaving only bells of lightning and its thunder

Finally a nitpick. I’m glad to see that Dylan’s astonishing late-career comeback is represented in the essential-songs list. “Nettie Moore,” from “Modern Times” (2006), is deeply moving, both weird and elegiac. But the Times could have chosen “Not Dark Yet,” from “Time Out of Mind,” the 1997 album that began Dylan’s revival, which continues 29 years later. “Not Dark Yet” is even more elegiac than “Nettie Moore,” if less weird, and Daniel Lanois’ production makes it one of Dylan’s greatest recordings.

At least they got Patti Smith to contribute her thoughts about “It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding).” She recalls hearing Dylan perform it live, before he recorded it. She says in part:

What I remember most was the line “I got nothing, Ma, to live up to,” which made me very sad. But the line that made me feel understood, and that I have held onto my whole life, was “If my thought-dreams could be seen, they’d probably put my head in a guillotine.” A person like me, who had many conflicting thoughts about everything, a lot that I kept to myself: I felt like he understood.

My caveat is that absolutely no one is going to be satisfied with anyone’s list of Dylan’s most esential songs. Mine changes all the time — and no doubt yours does, too.

Amid a worldwide surge of authoritarianism, the U.S. falls again in press-freedom rankings

Every semester, I introduce my media ethics students to the World Press Freedom Index, an annual compilation by Reporters Without Borders that tracks 180 countries.

Follow my Bluesky newsfeed for additional news and commentary. And please join my Patreon for just $6 a month. You’ll receive a supporters-only newsletter every Thursday.

The United States does not do well, and the just-released 2026 update is no exception. We are now 64th, coming in just behind Botswana and just ahead of Panama. As RSF (the French acronym for Reporters Without Borders) puts it, “After a century of gradual expansion of press rights in the United States, the country is experiencing a significant and prolonged decline in press freedom, with Donald Trump’s return to the presidency greatly exacerbating the situation.”

Continue reading “Amid a worldwide surge of authoritarianism, the U.S. falls again in press-freedom rankings”

‘Beat the Press’ takes on the WHCA shooting: Coverage, conspiracies and the Times’ too-early print deadline

A shaken Wolf Blitzer of CNN describes what it was like to be in close proximity to the gunman at the WHCA dinner. Click on the image to watch.

On the brand-new “Beat the Press with Emily Rooney,” we examine the aftermath of the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner. Click here or on the image to watch.

What pressures did the press experience in covering the story under frightening, confusing conditions? Why did conspiracy theories about the shooting spread so quickly? And does The New York Times’ print deadline have to be quite so early given that other papers — including The Washington Post and The Boston Globe — managed to get the story on page one?

We also take a look at the hypocrisy at the heart of a rumored affair involving Patriots coach Mike Vrabel and Athletic reporter (make that former reporter) Dianne Russini as well as an attempt by Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey to restrict teenagers’ access to social media. Plus our Rants & Raves.

Emily is joined by Contrarian Boston editor Scott Van Voorhis, Lylah Alphone of The Boston Globe and me, with expert production by Tonia Magras.

The Saturday-night shooting at the WHCA dinner underscores the declining relevance of print

I hear from so many people that they can’t live without their print newspaper and morning coffee that I’m often tempted to remind them it’s technically possible to drink coffee while reading the news on your iPad.

The declining relevance of print is top of mind this morning as The New York Times failed to get the White House Correspondents Dinner shooting into its dead-tree edition. Lest you think this is a Boston delivery problem, it’s also not in the replica edition. Needless to say, it’s all over the Times homepage, and it probably found its way into the late city editions as well.

The (deservedly) much-maligned Washington Post managed to go big with the shooting in its print edition. You might say that’s a function of being the hometown paper, but it’s really not. It’s a function of press times.

The Boston Globe leads its print edition with the shooting, alongside the firing of Red Sox manager Alex Cora.

No excuses for the Los Angeles Times, which is three hours behind the East Coast, meaning that the incident took place around 5 p.m. Pacific time.

Of course, even those papers whose editors managed to yell “Stop the presses!” and get the story into print have much more up-to-date news about the shooting in their digital editions today.

We get the print edition of the Sunday Times because, whenever we try to cancel in order to save money, we’re offered a special deal. Digital advertising isn’t worth much, but print ads are still fairly lucrative, especially in the Times and especially on Sunday. But when there’s a big, late-breaking story, digital is the place to be.

Gov. Healey wants to remove public access to vital records. So we’re giving her a Muzzle Award — her third.

Gov. Maura Healey, left, with Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll. 2023 photo in the public domain.

Six years ago, then-Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, a moderate Republican, earned a New England Muzzle Award — then hosted by GBH News — for proposing a change in the public-records laws so that access to birth, death and marriage records would not be available to the public for many decades. The delay would have amounted to 90 years in the case of birth and marriage records and 50 years after a person’s death.

Follow my Bluesky newsfeed for additional news and commentary. And please join my Patreon for just $6 a month. You’ll receive a supporters-only newsletter every Thursday.

Fortunately, the bill didn’t pass. But now Baker’s successor, Gov. Maura Healey, a liberal Democrat, is back with a similar bill. As The Boston Globe put it in an editorial (sub. req.) on Thursday:

In a state that already has a dreadful reputation for its lack of transparency and will probably face a ballot question over the exemptions from the state’s public records law accorded the governor’s office and the Legislature, this is simply the wrong law at the wrong time.

The Globe observes that Healey, in her announcement touting the legislation, emphasizes one of its few positive aspects — the end of references to “out of wedlock” on birth and marriage certificates. The rest of it, though, would deprive researchers of information they need to do their work in areas such as public health and genealogy. And she has stacked the deck in favor of passage by making it part of a budget bill that must be approved and for which debate is limited.

As I wrote in 2020, these records have been freely available to anyone who asks for them since the early Puritan era. Investigative reporter Jenifer McKim of GBH News said on Twitter at the time: “As MA governor [Baker] works to make birth, death records secret, thinking of the stories I’ve written and produced with the help of these key, currently public, documents, including suicides at colleges and universities.”

And in a 2020 interview with the Chelsea Record, Ryan Woods, executive vice president of the New England and Genealogical Society, said, “Unequivocally it was a surprise to us. There had not been any public discussion about this until it appeared in the budget.”

This is not Gov. Healey’s first time around with the Muzzle Awards. In 2015, when she was the state attorney general, I singled her out for defending a 1946 state law that criminalized political lies aimed at influencing an election, as if that were even theoretically possible.

In 2018, also a time when she was AG, she won another Muzzle, this one for upholding rulings that public information should, in some cases, remain private. Then-Globe reporter Todd Wallack, now with The Washington Post, documented a number of Healey’s attempts to suppress public records. His most startling finding: Healey’s office had upheld a ruling by the Worcester district attorney that records pertaining to the 1951 murder of a state trooper should not be made public. Healey’s decision reversed a ruling by Secretary of State Bill Galvin’s office and denied a friend of the murder victim the opportunity to follow up some leads on his own. The friend had since died.

Massachusetts has one of the worst reputations in the country with regard to public records. All too often, Maura Healey has been part of the problem rather than part of the solution.

Thinking through the legal and ethical issues raised by Kash Patel’s libel case against The Atlantic

Kash Patel. Photo (cc) 2022 by Gage Skidmore.

FBI Director Kash Patel’s $250 million libel suit against The Atlantic may prove to be nothing more than bluster. Nevertheless, it’s already raised some interesting issues about ethics and defamation law, and I thought it would be useful to walk through some of them here.

Follow my Bluesky newsfeed for additional news and commentary. And please join my Patreon for just $6 a month. You’ll receive a supporters-only newsletter every Thursday.

Patel sued after Sarah Fitzpatrick reported Friday that Patel’s tenure at the FBI has been marred by excessive drinking, lapses in judgment and a shocking lack of discipline. The story, she writes, was based on “more than two dozen people I interviewed about Patel’s conduct, including current and former FBI officials, staff at law-enforcement and intelligence agencies, hospitality-industry workers, members of Congress, political operatives, lobbyists, and former advisers.” There are no named sources who say they’ve had first-hand knowledge of Patel’s alleged misbehavior. Still, that’s a lot of sources.

Continue reading “Thinking through the legal and ethical issues raised by Kash Patel’s libel case against The Atlantic”

A Muzzle to the town of Hanover, N.H., for refusing to release arrest records after a Dartmouth protest

Dartmouth College. 2007 public domain photo by Kane5187.

When the police arrest someone, the public has a right to know the reason. That’s why virtually every public-records law in the country requires that the police release basic information about those they’ve taken into custody, including name, address and the charges filed against them. And as long as there’s no danger of compromising an investigation, the police are required to release more detailed information as well.

But apparently that’s not how they conduct business in the town of Hanover, New Hampshire. Because when two student protesters at Dartmouth College were arrested in October 2023, the town refused to release the reports. The Valley News, the local newspaper serving that area, took the town to court. And when a state judge in August 2024 ordered the town to produce the records, local officials not only dragged their feet for a few more weeks but they also refused to pay The Valley News’ legal fees, which is required under state law.

Last week, the town lost that case as well. And thus we present town officials in Hanover with a New England Muzzle Award for gross interference with the public’s right to know. Here’s how the state Supreme Court put it in a 3-0 decision:

Having concluded that this lawsuit was necessary to enforce compliance with the Right-to-Know Law and that Hanover knew or should have known that its blanket denial violated that law, we necessarily conclude that Valley News is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs under RSA 91-A:8, I. [That’s a reference to the state’s Right-to-Know Law.]

According to Claire Shanahan of The Valley News, those legal costs are in the process of being calculated.

After the records were released in September 2024, John Lippman of The Valley News reported that they revealed the two students were arrested “at the behest of college officials who wanted them cited for criminal trespass.” The students had set up a tent as part of pro-Palestinian protests aimed at pressuring Dartmouth to divest from investments “that are complicit in apartheid and its apparatuses.” Lippman wrote:

Although the demonstration was peaceful, Hanover police prepared for the students’ arrests as if they were undertaking a major police operation by dividing into double-officer teams called “arrest team 1” and “arrest team 2” which were staged behind Parkhurst Hall, out of sight of the protesters.

The students were charged with misdemeanor offenses. According to Alesandra Gonzales of The Dartmouth, the two students were found guilty and, in February 2025, were sentenced to 20 hours of community service each plus a $310 fine that could be satisfied through that service.

After last week’s state Supreme Court ruling on legal fees, Valley News publisher Rich Wallace hailed the decision as a blow for governmental transparency:

This ruling affirms a simple but essential principle: the public has a right to know, and that right must be defended. Awarding fees in this case recognizes that transparency should not come at a financial penalty to those willing to stand up for it. We pursued this not just for our newsroom, but for the community we serve — and today’s decision strengthens accountability for everyone.

Shanahan wrote that the town and the police department withheld records because of their “active criminal prosecution of the case” — an argument that clearly did not impress Judge Steven Houran, who ordered that the records be released, or the state Supreme Court.

The Washington Star is back, and so is its long-running rivalry with The Washington Post

Maybe not quite so final after all. Photo via eBay.

Forty-five years after The Washington Star closed its doors, its long-running rivalry with The Washington Post is lurching back to life. NOTUS, a fledgling digital publication, is rebranding itself as The Star in June and is expanding in an attempt to take advantage of recent deep cuts at the Post, especially in local news and sports.

Katie Robertson reports in The New York Times that The Star plans to expand its newsroom from about 45 to 95 staff members by the end of the year. That’s still well short of the 400 to 500 that the Post employs, but The Star should presumably be able to carve out a niche by focusing on areas where the Post is weak. (Robertson’s story makes no mention of whether there will be a print edition. My guess is no.)

Continue reading “The Washington Star is back, and so is its long-running rivalry with The Washington Post”

Registration is now open for our free What Works webinar on ‘Audience, AI and Events’

We’re excited to announce an all-star lineup for our 2026 What Works webinar, “Audience, AI and Events,” aimed at practical skills for local news publishers. This free, all-day teleconference will be held on Thursday, May 21. You’ll be able to sign up for interactive workshops facilitated by leaders in their fields. Please register today!

What Works is part of Northeastern University’s School of Journalism and is affiliated with the Center for Transformative Media.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette will go nonprofit after being acquired by The Baltimore Banner’s owner

Pittsburgh. Photo (cc) 2017 by Patrick Kinney.

When the owners of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette announced earlier this year that the paper would shut down in May, it was widely noted that such a move would leave Pittsburgh as the largest city in the country without a daily newspaper. That said, it seemed unlikely. The very fact that the Block family decided to keep operating the paper until May all but guaranteed that some new ownership possibilities would emerge.

And today, that’s exactly what happened. The Venetoulis Institute for Local Journalism, which owns the nonprofit Baltimore Banner, will buy the Post-Gazette and operate the paper as a nonprofit. If I’m not mistaken, that will make the Post-Gazette the second metro daily to go the nonprofit route, following The Salt Lake Tribune. A few other large regional dailies, most notably The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Tampa Bay Times, are for-profits owned by nonprofits.

The Venetoulis Institute was established by Baltimore billionaire Stewart Bainum as his vehicle for launching The Baltimore Banner, a digital-only news organization that he started after he was spurned in his attempts to buy The Baltimore Sun. The Banner has grown into one of the most admired news outlets in the country, and it recently announced it would expand its coverage area and sports reporting in response to massive cuts at The Washington Post. Ted Venetoulis was a friend of Bainum’s and an advocate for local news in Baltimore.

The Post-Gazette has been riven in recent years by a long-running battle between management and the union as well as racial turmoil, so its acquisition by a public-minded institution like Venetoulis is good news indeed.

“Venetoulis is committed to solving a national problem, to providing high-quality local journalism where it’s most needed,” Venetoulis CEO Bob Cohn was quoted as telling the Banner. “That is our civic mission. And here is an opportunity to do that in a market where the 240-year-old incumbent is going out of business or could be sold.”

In an interview with The New York Times, Bainum said, “The Block family should be recognized for selling this at a huge discount for the price they could have received.”

The change will also lead to the return of former Post-Gazette executive editor David Shribman, whose previous stops include a Pulitzer Prize-winning stint as Washington bureau chief for The Boston Globe. Shribman, who was the Post-Gazette’s top editor from 2003 to 2019, will served on the Venetoulis board.