By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

CommonWealth Beacon reports new details on Andrea Estes’ firing by the Globe

Photo (cc) 2022 by Dan Kennedy

CommonWealth Beacon has just published a story by its editor, Bruce Mohl, shedding some light on an exceedingly strange episode from earlier this year: The Boston Globe’s decision to fire veteran investigative reporter Andrea Estes after the paper published a story reporting that three top MBTA managers were living far from Greater Boston when in fact they made their homes in the local area. The story, on which Estes had the lead byline, reported that nine T officials had such an arrangement; in fact, it was six. The Globe had to run several corrections as a result.

Mohl reports that the errors in the story came about because the managers themselves were not allowed as a matter of policy to speak with the press without permission, and that they thought the MBTA public relations office was going to respond on their behalf — but the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) ordered the T to stay silent. Mohl writes:

At the MBTA, workers are advised not to talk to reporters, leaving that job to public relations officials. But in this instance the MBTA public relations officials, on orders from higher-ups at the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, ignored calls from Estes seeking to verify the information she had gathered. The result was a story that unfairly tarred at least three employees at the MBTA and caused the firing of Estes.

Disclosure: I’m a member of CommonWealth’s board of advisers.

This entire saga has been weird, and though Mohl’s story answers some of the outstanding questions, it doesn’t answer all of them. Why would MassDOT not allow the T to defend its own employees? Why was Estes fired if she wasn’t entirely at fault? In addition, editor Nancy Barnes said there would be some public accountability after Estes left the Globe, but Mohl suggests that may have been derailed by a pending arbitration hearing sought by Estes.

A further indication that at least some of Estes’ peers believe she was wronged came when she was hired recently as a staff reporter by the Plymouth Independent, a fledgling nonprofit edited by Mark Pothier, until recently a high-ranking editor at the Globe, and advised by Globe legend Walter Robinson. “Having her on staff sends a strong message about the kind of serious journalism we plan to do,” Pothier said in a press release announcing her hiring.

Thanks to Mohl’s digging, we now know more than we did. I still hope the full story comes out at some point.

Earlier:

Leave a comment | Read comments


Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Previous

Friedman’s dark vision

Next

Does Fox News lead or follow its audience? Yes.

3 Comments

  1. Paul Creighton

    Another reason not to bother with the Globe.
    Andrea Estes is top shelf and maybe too good for the Globe.

  2. Stephen R Nelson

    Nice job by Bruce, even though he couldn’t get answers to all of his questions.

  3. MD

    Bruce- this piece seems to imply that because the MDOT and the MBTA did not respond to Estes, it can’t 100% be her fault if she got the facts wrong. Isn’t that giving a journalist a huge pass? Should it not be a part of a journalist’s job to ensure facts are facts. Just because folks refuse to comment (which happens all the time) that doesn’t mean her work was done and she could go to print. Refusing to comment is not the equivalent of confirmation.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén