By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

In newspaper innovation, Bezos lags behind Henry

I’ve been saying for some time that John Henry has been more aggressively innovative at The Boston Globe than Jeff Bezos has at The Washington Post. Now Dylan Byers of Politico weighs in with this article, writing that “the Post, far from embarking on the radical reinvention that many thought Bezos would bring, remains more old school than cutting edge.”

Bezos has moved cautiously. His choice as publisher — former Reagan confidant Fred Ryan — seems anything but innovative. Henry, meanwhile, installed himself in the publisher’s office and has presided over high-profile new projects like Capital, a weekly political section, and Crux, a standalone website “covering all things Catholic.”

Byers also writes that Post executive editor Marty Baron is “the epitome of the 20th-century newspaperman,” which strikes me as both tonally and factually wrong. If anything, Baron was one of the more digitally savvy big-paper editors when he ran the Globe newsroom — a period that took place entirely in the 21st century, by the way.

But I think Byers’ overall point is correct. The Post is a fine newspaper, and it’s gotten bigger and better under Bezos’ stewardship. If there is to be a more drastic reinvention, though, we’re going to have to wait.

Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Ferguson and the importance of citizen media


The Herald has some explaining to do

1 Comment

  1. Miles Fidelman

    The tone of the article is that there’s something wrong with Bezos not pursuing “aggressive innovation with the Post. Given that “The Post is a fine newspaper, and it’s gotten bigger and better under Bezos’ stewardship,” why should he? In this case, being conservative in his actions seems like a very good thing.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén