The state’s weak public-records law has long needed to be reformed. A lack of meaningful penalties for government agencies that refuse to turn over public records, outrageous fees and other problems make Massachusetts a laggard when it comes to transparency. Several years ago the State Integrity Investigation awarded Massachusetts a richly deserved “F” on public access to information.
Last week brought mind-boggling news from Todd Wallack of The Boston Globe, who reported that Secretary of State William Galvin’s office has issued rulings allowing certain formerly public records to be suppressed, including arrest reports of police officers charged with drunken driving. (Galvin later turned around and called for an initiative petition to put some teeth in the public-records law. Make of that what you will.)
Now the Globe, the Boston Herald and GateHouse Media Massachusetts have editorialized in favor of significant reform. The Massachusetts Freedom of Information Alliance, a group comprising the New England First Amendment Coalition, the ACLU of Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association and others, is calling for immediate action.
Seventeen of my colleagues and I at Northeastern’s School of Journalism lent our voices to the cause this week with a letter that has been published in the Globe, the Herald and (so far) two GateHouse papers: The Patriot Ledger of Quincy and The Herald News of Fall River. Because the Globe and the Herald were unable to run everyone’s names, I am posting them here. They include full-time as well as adjunct faculty:
- Dan Kennedy, interim director
- Chris Amico
- Mike Beaudet
- Nicholas Daniloff (emeritus)
- Charles Fountain
- Carlene Hempel
- Joy Horowitz
- Jeff Howe
- William Kirtz
- Dina Kraft
- Jean McMillan Lang
- Laurel Leff
- Gladys McKie
- Lincoln McKie
- Bill Mitchell
- Tinker Ready
- James Ross
- Alan Schroeder
This is Sunshine Week, an annual celebration of open government. In Massachusetts it’s time to let the sun shine in.