Like COVID or an overdue tax bill, the debut issue of The Transcript & Journal made its unwelcome appearance in our home earlier today. The weekly paper is a mash-up of Gannett’s Medford Transcript and Somerville Journal, a move that was announced earlier this year as part of the chain’s decision to eliminate 19 Massachusetts weeklies and merge nine others into four.
Last week’s final issue of the Medford Transcript had local news on the front page — a story about a debate among city council members on whether they should continue to meet weekly or switch to every other week and a report on efforts to build a replacement for (or substantially renovate) Medford High School.
But the front of The Transcript & Journal, as promised, replaces all that with regional news such as the Fair Share proposal to implement a statewide tax on millionaires and the opening of new restaurants in far-flung locales such as Brighton and Kingston. Meanwhile, there’s nothing on a story reported by The Boston Globe earlier this week on a civil-rights complaint filed against the Medford Police Department in which two Black residents say they were unlawfully stopped.
There is one Medford article on the front — a feature on a 10-year-old walking loop that recognizes the city’s historic landmarks. It’s a good story about something I wasn’t familiar with. It was also written by a journalism student at Endicott College. Now, journalism students are some of my favorite people. But we see what’s going on here, right?
And that’s it for the A section other than press releases, obituaries and a story about restaurants at the Burlington Mall. The B section, devoted to local sports, seems pretty much unchanged, but it was thin to begin with.
At a webinar earlier this week organized by the Shorenstein Center at the Harvard Kennedy School, Mizell Stewart III, vice president of news performance, talent and partnerships for Gannett and the USA Today Network, described the move as an attempt to drive digital subscriptions and to focus on local news that has a greater impact on people’s lives.
“Covering local news continues to be very labor intensive and very expensive,” Stewart said. The idea is to take “a more regional approach” and focus on “commonalities and trends.” But isn’t that why we have regional media like The Boston Globe, public radio and local TV newscasts?
This will not end well.
4 thoughts on “Our local Gannett weekly has given way to a mash-up of regional news”
I keep think of Cambridge Day as a model of what local coverage can look like these days.
For a related story, about Arlington’s weekly, read https://www.yourarlington.com/search/news-archive/370-media/20332-merger-051122.html
We in the Lynn area are fortunate to have the locally owned Lynn item. Today’s page 1 included local stories from Lynn, Swampscott, Nahant and Saugus as well as locally based stories on nurses and children’s mental health which featured quotes from local leaders.
I really do not understand how people on the one hand side demand super local news from newspapers, but on the other hand side are not willing to pay for a newspaper subscription.
It does not make sense for newspaper companies to pay for generation of local news content, when all the advertisement dollars go to Facebook or Google.
So instead of blaming the bad bad newspaper companies, start blaming yourself for not supporting local news by subscriptions.
Comments are closed.