By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

A Taylor-made Globe?

In what may prove to be very good news for readers of the Boston Globe, a group led by Stephen Taylor — a prominent member of the family that sold the paper to the New York Times Co. in 1993 — has, if I’m reading the tea leaves correctly, moved into the pole position to buy the paper.

Beth Healy reports in today’s Globe that Taylor and California-based Platinum Equity have made it to the next round, and that both groups will tour the paper around Labor Day. Meanwhile, a group led by Partners HealthCare chairman Jack Connors and Boston Celtics co-owner Stephen Pagliuca — pointedly described as having submitted “the lowest bid” — will be on the outside looking in. Whether that might change is unclear.

No new owner of the Globe, not even a Taylor, is going to restore the glory days. But the Taylors were very good stewards of the paper, and Stephen Taylor, a former Globe business executive, is said to be one of the sharper members of his family. In addition, a Media Nation source who knows him tells me he’s a good guy.

Connors, too, is a good guy. But he’s also involved in just about every civic and business group in Greater Boston, and it’s hard to believe he could offer the Globe the sort of independent leadership it needs. Given that he and Pagliuca are said to be interested in pursuing some sort of non-profit arrangement, you also have to wonder whether they’ve got enough capital to pull it off.

According to Healy, both the Taylor group and Platinum submitted bids to buy the Globe, the Telegram & Gazette of Worcester and for about $35 million (a far cry from the $1.1 billion the Times Co. paid 16 years ago for just the Globe) and agreed to assume $59 million in pension liabilities.

Given that Times Co. chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. recently said price will not be the only consideration, I would think a group with deep roots in both Boston and journalism would have an advantage over Platinum, whose executives may be interested mainly in the real estate.

For big-money investors, $94 million is not an enormous sum. I suspect that what will separate the winner from the losers in this deal is the willingness and ability to keep losing money until the paper can be restructured into a profitable business. And yes, I’m confident that someone can do it.

More: Over at Beat the Press, Ralph Ranalli laments the exclusion of the Connors group, arguing that non-profit is the only viable model for the newspaper business moving forward. Ralph and I agree, though, that Platinum would be bad news all around.

Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Democracy and the Senate (II)


Alpha-testers wanted


  1. LFNeilson

    Dan,3rd paragraph – 3rd line:said to BE one . . .

  2. LFNeilson

    5th graph, 3rd line:$59 in pension liabilities.High finance.zzzzzzz

  3. Dan Kennedy

    Thank you, Larz. D'oh!

  4. acf

    I prefer the idea of a Taylor ownership of the Globe over the Platinum one because one has a history in the newspaper business, while the other looks like a money business with hopes of building a newspaper conglomerate with distressed pieces bought at fire sale prices.

  5. Treg

    I like the Taylor scenario for all the reasons already cited. Plus, talk about laughing all the way (back) to the bank.

  6. lkcape

    Aside from the damage done to the brand while The Times has been owner, it sounds like a great deal for Taylor.

  7. Dan Kennedy

    Rich: I'm afraid that your friend is correct. Too bad.Nial: When "Between the Lines" came out, I was an editor at the Northeastern News, which was printed at that time by the Phoenix. So we all got to go to the premiere. Good movie.

  8. Michael Pahre

    Dan, you wrote:"Connors, too, is a good guy. But he's also involved in just about every civic and business group in Greater Boston…"That is way-off hyperbole, rather surprising for your usual writing.I can name a gad-zillion civic groups in Greater Boston that Connors is not a member of. Not just that, but ones that fight against Connors and his business groups' and non-profits' plans.Since I live in Brighton, there is an easy example. Connors until recently chaired the Board of Trustees at Boston College that bought land from the Archdiocese of Boston and wants to develop it to the tune of $1 billion; there are many civic groups lined up in opposition to key elements of those plans (e.g., location of student dorms). I won't even bother asking the people in those civic groups if Connors is on their membership lists… I know the what the answer would be.His role in fund-raising for parochial schools for the Archdiocese of Boston, and his leadership of Partners HealthCare to overcharge health insurers and run ramrod over all competition, are other cases where he has a personal, vested interest in particular policies. Those kinds of conflicts would make his ownership of the Globe, and influence over its editorial board decisions, a mess.You were accurate when you said earlier that he's a walking conflict-of-interest. The NY Times Co. lucked out that he submitted the low bid, because now they have an easy way to avoid dealing with his baggage.

  9. Jerry

    It’s nice to know also that Steve Taylor is a news junkie, or at least used to be. Back when there were only three 6 p.m. newscasts and before Tivo, etc. he was known to watch them all simultaneously.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén