BoMag and the Globe offer dueling theories about who shot David Ortiz

David Ortiz celebrates the first of his three championships with the Red Sox. Photo (cc) 2013 by Colin Steele.

Boston magazine and The Boston Globe published dueling stories over the weekend that recount the 2019 shooting of Red Sox legend David Ortiz.

The Boston magazine story, by Mike Damiano, appears to have been many weeks, if not months, in the making — it’s a rich, deeply reported story about Ortiz’s life in the Dominican Republic and his complicated family situation. The Globe article, by Bob Hohler, may have been assigned (or least put on the fast track) in reaction to  BoMag. It’s a newsy account of that attempts to get to the bottom of who ordered Ortiz’s shooting, and why.

By all means, read both. But by far the most interesting detail is the dueling theories about the role of a major drug trafficker, César Peralta, known as “The Abuser.” According to the Globe’s account, former Boston police commissioner Ed Davis, who was hired by Ortiz to investigate the shooting, Peralta is in fact the guy who ordered the hit. Hohler writes:

Davis, disclosing his findings for the first time, said the powerful and politically connected drug lord César “The Abuser” Peralta came to feel disrespected by Ortiz, prompting him to place a bounty on Ortiz’s head and sanction the ragtag hit squad that tried to kill him.

“Peralta said he had David shot,” Davis said in an interview, citing information that he said US law enforcement officials gathered and shared with him.

The BoMag story, on the other hand, all but rules out Peralta as having any role. Here’s what Damiano has to say:

As I, too, tried to get to the bottom of what caused the shooting, I found that the closer I got to people with genuine knowledge of the Santo Domingo underworld, the more skepticism I heard about the love-triangle theory and any possibility of Peralta’s involvement. One man I spoke with who knows many of the men in Peralta’s circle, as well as some of the men accused of involvement in the shooting, said that the theory was bunk. No part of it added up, he said, and hardly anyone in his neighborhood — Herrera, a hot bed of Dominican drug trafficking — believed it.

The two accounts also raise some questions about access. The Globe’s owner and publisher, John Henry, is also the principal owner of the Red Sox. Davis is a security consultant for the Globe. It does not appear that Davis shared his theory about Peralta with BoMag.

Both stories dismiss the widely mocked theory put forth by Dominican authorities that Ortiz was the victim of mistaken identity.

The conclusion I took away from Damiano’s and Hohler’s reporting was that we may never know who ordered the hit on Ortiz. I’m just glad he’s still with us.

Footnote: I’m told that Damiano has been hired by the Globe.

Please support this free source of news and commentary by becoming a member of Media Nation for just $5 a month.

4 thoughts on “BoMag and the Globe offer dueling theories about who shot David Ortiz

  1. Steve Ross

    Can’t wait for the Fox News story denying Big Papi was ever shot in the first place, or was shot by Hunter Biden.

    1. Steve Ross

      Or maybe Hillary? After all, he was shot in the back. On the Minuteman Trail. And transported to DR.

      Fox likes those narratives.

      I don’t want to treat the shooting with jokes — it was no joke — but I am fascinated with dueling narratives and relatively murky sources.

  2. Robert Consalvo

    Davis took the money and the easy way out. Disappointing.

    Robert W. Consalvo Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2 Get Outlook for Android ________________________________ From: Media Nation Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 8:45:21 AM To: bobconsalvo@msn.com Subject: [New post] BoMag and the Globe offer dueling theories about who shot David Ortiz

    Dan Kennedy posted: ” Boston magazine and The Boston Globe published dueling stories over the weekend that recount the 2019 shooting of Red Sox legend David Ortiz. The Boston magazine story, by Mike Damiano, appears to have been many weeks, if not months, in the making ” Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on Media Nation [http://0.gravatar.com/blavatar/aa09390c6b26329fd16c35859ad45875?s=32&d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Femails%2Fblavatar.png] [http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c0b5319fa0f116cadf578b7ad8964fd8?s=50&d=identicon&r=PG] BoMag and the Globe offer dueling theories about who shot David Ortiz by Dan Kennedy

    [https://dankennedy.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/10630783783_2c71c17290_k.jpg?w=560]David Ortiz celebrates the first of his three championships with the Red Sox. Photo (cc) 2013 by Colin Steele.

    Boston magazine and The Boston Globe published dueling stories over the weekend that recount the 2019 shooting of Red Sox legend David Ortiz.

    The Boston magazine story, by Mike Damiano, appears to have been many weeks, if not months, in the making — it’s a rich, deeply reported story about Ortiz’s life in the Dominican Republic and his complicated family situation. The Globe article, by Bob Hohler, may have been assigned (or least put on the fast track) in reaction to BoMag. It’s a newsy account of that attempts to get to the bottom of who ordered Ortiz’s shooting, and why.

    By all means, read both. But by far the most interesting deta

Comments are closed.