My Northeastern University colleague Chuck Fountain and I discuss the legacy of Walter Cronkite in a webcast posted on the university’s Web site.
Discover more from Media Nation
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions
My Northeastern University colleague Chuck Fountain and I discuss the legacy of Walter Cronkite in a webcast posted on the university’s Web site.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Comments are closed.
Paper cups, water bottles, chairs that encourage participantns to slouch and some cable sports or news network on a monitor in the background. Beats the overly-ambitious sets and mind-grating graphics of the "professional" talking-heads shows any day.
Oh how this brings me back! I miss listening to you two! But of course I have a point to add…Isn't the news landscape actually missing someone who inspires the kind of trust of a Cronkite? Sure the days of the imperial figures are gone, but isn't there a possibility that we could go back to square one if a dominating figure emerged from the ashes of what some still generously call the network newscasts?
Steve: Great to hear from you — you've got to tell me what you're up to. Are you still in New Orleans? I hope not.I think we've had a number of anchors who were as good (or almost as good) as Cronkite. Ted Koppel, in particular, comes to mind. For that matter, I think all three network anchors now are perfectly fine.But in an era of media fragmentation, you can't have a Cronkite, because you'll never have 50 or 60 percent of the country sitting down to watch one newscast. As a culture we don't even agree on what's true anymore.I could go on and on (and on). But that's my starting point.