By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

Globe e-mails underscore tensions

How tense is the Boston Globe newsroom these days? Mighty tense indeed, judging from the response by political reporter Brian Mooney (left) to an e-mail sent Tuesday by business reporter Rob Gavin to members of the Boston Newspaper Guild. The e-mails were obtained from an unimpeachable source.

Next Monday, members of the Newspaper Guild vote on whether to accept a contract revision, negotiated by New York Times Co. management and the Guild, and presented to the membership without a Guild recommendation. The deal calls for a pay cut of about 10 percent as well as an end to lifetime job guarantees for about 190 employees.

On Tuesday at 4:33 p.m., Gavin sent the following e-mail to Guild members:

Hello everyone,

Rob Gavin in the newsroom here. For a story in advance of the Guild contract vote, i’m trying to do a poll of sentiment among Guild members.

If you’re a guild member, and would be willing to participate, please respond to this email with:

yes (meaning you plan to vote for contract)…
no (meaning you plan to vote against the contract..
or undecided.

All responses will be kept confidential by me, not shared with anyone else, and deleted as soon as I tally them. I’ll only publish the results if I get a large enough sample. Of course, as pollsters say, this would only be a snapshot of voter sentiment at this particular time, and not necessarily how people might actually vote on Monday. I know this is sensitive, but I figured it’s worth a try. If you think you can help me, please respond (be careful to avoid the respond to all) by end to the day tomorrow. If not, no problem. I understand.

thanks again,

rob gavin

Less than a half-hour later, Mooney sent the following response, also to everyone in the Guild:

You’ve got to be kidding, Rob.

Your time would be better spent writing a real story about the difference in the cuts the Times Co. wants the Guild members to take compared to the mild cuts and, in some cases, actual increases in fringe benefits for the managers and other exempts. I’m voting ‘no’ because that’s unfair.

Here’s another story idea. Why don’t you examine whether the Times Co. can really make good on its threat to shut down the Globe without bankrupting the New York Times Co.? According to their SEC filing, it cost $31 million to close Billerica, with a fraction of the employees we have here at Morrissey Boulevard. To pay all the severance obligations of the 1,400 union employees (plus the managers) would bankrupt the parent company, it’s pretty clear. The Times has something like $34 million in unencumbered cash and cannot borrow money (without going to Mexico and paying usurious 14-percent interest rates).

If they shut the Globe, it would be a murder-suicide.

Vote “No” next Monday.

Brian C. Mooney

It’s hard to know exactly what will happen if the Guild votes the proposal down. Though management has threatened to impose a 23 percent pay cut unilaterally, it no longer appears to be threatening to shut the Globe down.

In a recent interview with Boston magazine, Guild president Dan Totten sounds like he’s itching for his members to vote “no” and re-open negotiations, telling reporter Jason Schwartz: “What’s been put before us is completely unacceptable. And I think people are ready, willing, and able to do something on that matter.”

In less than a week, we’ll have a better idea of where the Globe goes from here.

File photo of Mooney (cc) 2007 by Dan Kennedy. Some rights reserved. See Creative Commons terms in left-hand rail.

Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.


The DiMasi indictment


Globe memos just keep on coming


  1. NewsHound

    14% interest was the rate on the last loan. Maybe the next loan request will be denied. Why in the world would anyone want to lend money, especially the way bankruptcy laws are being negotiated in the USA this year?Upper management should be able to survive quite a few years going forward on previous pay – thus substantial savings by cutting Miss. Robinson, Pinch – Punch, et al from payroll.

  2. Treg

    "Miss. Robinson, Pinch – Punch, et al" – Translation, please?Anyway, I thought there'd be a lot more comments on this by now.

  3. NewsHound

    Treg – Janet Robinson is president of the New York Times Co, parent of Boston Globe. Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr. is chairman of the New York Times Co. board of directors. His nickname is Pinch. He descended to the position following his father's footsteps who was known as Punch.

  4. Rick in Duxbury

    Wilford Brimley works at the Globe?

  5. Bill Toscano

    The arrogance of people like Brian Mooney just floors me.These people have no idea how bad it is.Granted, some of the Golbe folks are among the best in the business, but if there are no jobs, there are no jobs.Why should others take the hit and reporters don't have to?Oh, yeah, that's because they are the "stars" of the industry.Yeah, no.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén