By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

It depends on what the meaning of “30 days” is

Maybe this is moot, given that Boston Globe spokesman Robert Powers now says the company won’t file the paperwork necessary to start a 60-day process aimed at closing the paper. But the question arose earlier today as to whether management had really threatened to close the paper in 30 days if it didn’t win $20 million in union concessions.

That’s certainly the way many people interpreted it. When I opened our front door early this morning, it was with the expectation that the Globe might not be there. Late last week, when the first deadline passed, Adam Gaffin of Universal Hub went so far as to post a photo of the Globe on his walkway to prove the paper was still around. And as recently as Saturday, the Globe itself put it this way:

Last night’s announcement extends a grueling month of negotiations and uncertainty that began in early April when the Times Co. called together leaders of the paper’s 13 unions and told them it would shutter the Globe unless it gained $20 million in concessions by May 1.

The deadline was then extended two days after an accounting error was revealed.

Earlier today a colleague told me it was always understood that the Times Co. wouldn’t actually close the Globe after 30 days, but, rather, would merely begin the process of closing it. I think that’s Clintonesque. The Times Co., by all appearances, was ready to pay the price of ignoring the federally mandated 60-day shutdown period. If union leaders had known from the beginning that they really had 90 days, they wouldn’t have entered into frantic negotiations last week and over the weekend.

In any case, the latest statement from Powers makes it appear that all sides may be very close to a final agreement — or that management thinks it’s hit upon a plan to accomplish its goals without the consent of the Boston Newspaper Guild, the one union that is still holding out. I certainly hope this is just about over. It’s unfair to Globe staffers, and to the community, to have to go through all of this again in two months.

What could management have in mind? The Boston Phoenix’s Adam Reilly has some pretty interesting material suggesting that the lifetime contracts could be voided “[i]n the event of a dramatic and apparently irreversible downturn in the Globe’s business.” That event now appears to be upon us. Call it the nuclear option — management-employee relations would never be the same.

Finally, former Globe columnist David Warsh has a fascinating look back at how and why the Taylor family decided to sell to the New York Times Co. in 1993, as well as an analysis of subsequent events.


A threat or an extension? Or both?


“Beat the Press” Web site goes public


  1. matteomht

    >>it would shutter the Globe unless it gained $20 million in concessions by May 1.<<Precisely: the NYT would shutter the Globe if it didn't receive the concessions *by* May 1. The NYT never said it would close the paper *on* May 1. That never struck me as Clintonesque at all– it just struck me as lawyerish, which negotiations of this magnitude certainly are. I still believe the NYT ultimately *will* shutter the Globe, of course– but that's more because the leadership on both sides is too stupid to figure a way out of this. They don't know that they are, but they are.

  2. Rich

    Thanks for the pointer to Warsh’s essay. Interesting stuff.Also, I agree with matteo. Hardly Clintonian.

  3. Ron Newman

    Warsh is always worth reading, but I have trouble with his implication that the Globe might have been better off not exposing the wrongs of the Archdiocese and the Big Dig.

  4. GFS3

    I have to agree with Dan on this one. The NYTimes made it seem as if the unions had 30 days or it would close down the paper right after that deadline. And if the NYTimes didn’t mean that – they certainly had plenty of time to correct that impression with other media and other bloggers. They did not choose to do that.As a lifelong reader and subscriber, I’ve been very disappointed at the lack of communication with readers and how Kremlin-like the NTTimes and Globe management has been with its loyal subscribers. We should be told and informed about progress and just what the heck they plan on doing with the Globe.Even if the unions agree to the concessions – this isn’t over by a long shot. They still need a move forward plan and there’s no indication they even have one.George Snell

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén