By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

Will Hoyt write about the “Note to Readers”?

Here’s part of what New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt wrote about the paper’s report on John McCain’s non-affair last Feb. 24:

A newspaper cannot begin a story about the all-but-certain Republican presidential nominee with the suggestion of an extramarital affair with an attractive lobbyist 31 years his junior and expect readers to focus on anything other than what most of them did. And if a newspaper is going to suggest an improper sexual affair, whether editors think that is the central point or not, it owes readers more proof than The Times was able to provide.

Given that this is a libel settlement we’re talking about, Hoyt is unlikely to call the Times’ “A Note to Readers” for what it is. But unless he’s changed his mind, we know what he’s thinking.

Previous

George Will’s uncorrected error

Next

Howard Owens has left the building

1 Comment

  1. Neil

    Nice job following this Dan. That’s the money quote by Hoyt. The ombudsman er, public editor, is vindicated I think.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén