By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

Christian Science Monitor goes Web-mostly

The only reason to publish an old-fashioned print newspaper in 2008 is because print advertising is more lucrative than Web advertising. Flip through the print edition of the Christian Science Monitor and you will see virtually no advertising. Therefore, the paper’s announcement today that it will switch to a mostly Web model next April makes eminent good sense.

The Monitor’s daily print edition is already little more than rumor. Where would you get one, other than stopping by a Christian Science Reading Room? Yet the Monitor’s Web site is popular enough to attract about 1.5 million visitors a month. (For purposes of comparison, Boston.com, the Globe’s Web site, attracts nearly 4.5 million visitors a month.)

The Monitor’s announcement makes it clear that the paper, founded by Mary Baker Eddy nearly 100 years ago, is in pretty tough financial shape — as is every newspaper operation. What the Monitor has that commercial papers lack is nonprofit ownership that can look at the long term — and pay a subsidy, as new-media consultant Ken Doctor notes, thus providing a vital bridge to the day that online revenues will start to cover the cost of news-gathering.

Those who insist on the printed word will be able to buy a weekly edition, which will allow the Monitor to engage in reverse-publishing — that is, in republishing content that appears online first. That’s what they’re doing in Madison, Wis., where the Capital Times earlier this week dropped its daily print edition and replaced it with two free tabloids filled with material from its Web site.

What’s happening at the Monitor had been long anticipated. If handled properly, it could be a positive development — and another big step in the paper’s (and the industry’s) evolution toward a model of putting the Web first.

Previous

Dianne Wilkerson, then and now

Next

In search of the fat lady

2 Comments

  1. Mark

    It will be interesting to see how this works out.I never once picked up a print edition of the CSM, but read their editorial page daily for a time.They have great content, and it will be interesting to see what they can do to adapt to being a web-only publication.I just hope major paper’s don’t follow suit. Tom Brokaw said that the print edition of the Washington Post would be dead in 10 years (nine by now). If that happens, it will be a real shame.

  2. LFNeilson

    The CSM has never had much advertising. It has always been subsidized by the church. The only thing that has changed has been decisions by the church as to what medium they want to use. Several years ago, they cut back on the CSM to go more heavily into TV. Then, if I’m not mistaken, they cut back on that.My father liked to say that there were three excellent newspapers published in Massachusetts: the CSM, the Wall Street Journal, “and modesty forbids that I name the third.”He always got a free subscription to the CSM, simply by agreeing to occasionally quote them or reprint an article. This goes back 50 years.zzzzzzz

Post a Comment. Real names, first and last, are recommended.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén