DePetro blames it all on his wife

It’s not uncommon for the head of the household to do all the actual filling-out of the diaries…the theory is that dad (or mom) asks all the kids what hey listened to that day and writes it down for them.It’s a system that’s ripe for abuse, but honestly, what part of the Arbitron diaries isn’t? (shrugs) And it’s been around for decades.Still, you’ve touched on why everyone is so eager for the Portable People Meter.

Fish: I didn’t realize that (a) WRKO is owned by the government or that (b) DePetro had a First Amendment right to make large amounts of money while spewing insults to a listenership of thousands (well, OK, dozens) of people. Please enlighten us.I will defend to the death DePetro’s right call Grace Ross a “fat lesbian” on his blog, if he gets one, or while selling pencils on any street corner of his choosing.And come on, now … do you really think he’d have been fired if anyone had been listening to him? I wrote that he was fired “after” his remark about Ross. I deliberately did not write “for.” It was a convenient excuse.

Give us a break, Fish…and do your homework first:http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/lowpwr.html#FREEA number of inquiries received at the Commission are from persons or groups who believe that there is a First Amendment, constitutionally protected right to broadcast. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly ruled on this subject and concluded that no right to broadcast exists.The FCC (and by extension, the US Gov’t) does not OWN the airwaves, it REGULATES them. A substantial difference. Much like how the government does not OWN your house, but can regulate it in the form of zoning laws, local taxes, etc.Granted, this typically applies more to pirates trying to operate an unlicensed radio station, rather than an employee fired for saying things his employer doesn’t like. But the fundamental concept applies equally.I think you do have something of a case here: DePetro said something unpopular (not to mention, IMHO, pretty moronic; without even being something cleverly controversial) and his boss – WRKO – smacked him down for it. I also agree that WRKO’s timing smacks of “looking for an excuse…any excuse” to fire DePetro because his ratings were weak to begin with. OTOH, I think DePetro’s comments aptly demonstrate his lack of skills in being a conserva-talker. He never got good ratings because, frankly, I don’t think he’s that good. I hate Rush Limbaugh to the core, and I largely despite Howard Stern, but I don’t deny that both of them are masters at their craft. DePetro struck me as a wannabe fumbler who never would’ve gotten on a signal like WRKO’s in a market as big as Boston if WRKO hadn’t been flushed and swirling so badly in recent years.And while Grace Ross was not slim and, yes, a lesbian…pointing out two facts that really have zero relevance to her campaign, in such a childish manner, does not compelling radio make. Perhaps it was the final straw in a string of poor performances?(Yeah, I’m kinda kicking DePetro while he’s down, I know…but frankly, nothing I’ve ever seen or heard him do inclines me to stop kicking. Given what it does to my industry as a whole…this Arbitron nonsense makes me feel I should buy steel-toed boots while I’m at it!)To take another track: I think a little perspective is in order here: when there’s so many other cases of flat out government censorship occurring on a regular basis (hello MBTA!) and with consequences far greater and reaching far more people than DePetro ever did? Why exactly are you so bent out of shape on this one?

Aaron: I don’t mean to disagree with you when you’re on a roll. But the whole theory behind regulation is that the airwaves are a scarce, publicly owned resource, which is almost the same thing as saying they’re owned by the government.I do look forward to the day when radio is delivered mainly over the Internet. With the scarcity rationale gone, there will no longer be any excuse to regulate what we hear (or see).