By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

The David Brooks matter comes to an end (probably)

I just want to put a “-30-” on this. The New York Times reported earlier today that disclosures will be added to David Brooks’ past columns in which he had a conflict of interest (background here). He’s resigned from his paid position at the Aspen Institute. Most important, I think, is this:

Mr. Brooks had received approval to take the paid position at Aspen in 2018, according to Eileen Murphy, a Times spokeswoman, but the current editors of the opinion section did not know about the arrangement.

Presumably this means that Brooks’ outside work was approved by former editorial-page editor James Bennet, who apparently saw nothing wrong with Brooks’ writing about Facebook and other Aspen funders without disclosing that to readers. Bennet is truly the gift that keeps on giving.

Brooks should have been more forthcoming than he was in his modified limited hangout on the “PBS NewsHour” Friday night. But barring any further disclosures, this story feels like it’s over.

And kudos to Craig Silverman and Ryan Mac of BuzzFeed News for their dogged reporting.

Previous

The Los Angeles Times may be on the verge of falling into Alden’s clutches

Next

There’s no reason to think that a Nextdoor-like service would have saved local news

2 Comments

  1. I’d love to see the paper trail on the approval.

  2. “hangout” — never heard that term for his visit to the confessional.

    In Chicago that was called a “skinback,” origins of the word vague but unattractive.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén