By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

The varieties of heroism

In my latest for the Guardian, I parse recent incidents in New York and Boston that call into question the meaning of heroism. We should realize that a hero is defined by what someone does, not by who he is.

Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.


Welcome back, Bruce


Politics and the BPL (II)


  1. Larz

    I agreed with you, Dan, until I looked up the word in Webster’s: 2. a person who, in the opinion of others, has heroic qualities or has performed a heroic act and is regarded as a model or ideal.I have always considered a hero to be someone who put his/her own life at risk in an attempt to save the life of another or achieve a noble goal. But the dictionary speaks more of the quality of character, and others’ perception of that character, rather than a test of the deed performed.Could we be probing too deeply into the spirit of heroism? With apologies to Descartes, “I think (you) are a hero, therefore (you) are.”Larz

  2. Rob

    I read this article today on the Guardian site. It’s the best and most sensible article I’ve seen on the site.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén