Yeah, she gives us conservatives a real great reputation… Thanks a bunch Ann…And am I the only one who doesn’t think she’s “smoking hot”- more like smoking-anorexic wraith.Why she thinks shes doing conservatives a favor by unecessarily lashing out is beyond me. Even if there is a small point buried deep within her tirades, it’s all lost in the sensationalist bull**** she constantly spews.Prediction: she will be single forever. Something tells me she’s not exactly wife material.

Metal, reread that final comment of yours. Does that not strike you as exactly the kind of thing Coulter would say?

If Ann Coulter is not over the top in terms of what should be the standards of reasonably civil political discourse, then there is no top. And for many years Republican have not just been buying her books but routinely pay her lavish sums to appear at their meetings. There is no liberal or Democratic equivalent. She is a one-woman refutation of the canard that the coarsening of political discourse in our times is bi-partisan in roughly equal measure. Perhaps the limited comeuppance she appears to be getting means that an important corner is finally in sight.

*watched the video*Yeeeaaah. It’s interesting that Ann Coulter wrote a book about liberals called Godless, but there is absolutely nothing about her that even hints to me that God has anything to do with her or her with God.And anyway, I stopped taking anything she said seriously after she proposed (post 9/11) that all Muslims in the US be DEPORTED or forcibly converted to Chrsitianity. Yes, she did write this in a column.

Answered my own question:http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002612877Excerpt: Published: June 02, 2006 5:30 PM ETNEW YORK Universal Press Syndicate columnist Ann Coulter has hired a White House-connected law firm to defend herself against allegations that she voted illegally in a Palm Beach, Fla., election, reported Palm Beach Post columnist Jose Lambiet Friday . . .”Elections Supervisor Arthur Anderson gave Coulter until April 30 to explain what happened, but she has yet to answer his registered letters. Now with Jimenez, [Deputy Elections Chief Charmaine] Kelly said, officials will wait ‘a few more weeks’ before starting a procedure that could strip Coulter of her right to vote here and refer the case to State Attorney Barry Krischer for possible prosecution.”

Whoa whoa whoa, Ken D.- “there is no Democratic equivalent”?A liberal equivalent of a shrill and brass-knuckled, irreverant, disrespectful, attack-dog Ann Coulter?Nah, none at all in the left.Nope.Not Soros, not Moore, not Dr. YEEEEAARRRGGGH- who has an impressive laundry list of phrases that could be deemed Coulteresque.But not to defend her or anything, I can’t stand her. Please just don’t purport that the left is somehow immune to the crazies, because that is, in the words of Bill O’Reilly, completely ridiculous. (now I’m gonna catch flak for watching O’Reilly… I swear I watch Blitzer too)

I have to share this:‘Coulter launches campaign against orphans, puppies’.

One thing I can say about Ann Coultier, she has a brilliant mind-yes, she says things that make all self-respecting Americans want to hide their face in the sand- but that doesn’t dispute the fact that the woman is highly intelligent. Case in point, her new book came out 6-6-06. Great publicity for her book. I predict it will become a national bestseller simply because of her tirades.

Mo -What has Dean said that is comparable to the filth that Coulter spews on a regular basis?Where is George Soros invited as a regular commentator? Or, for that matter, Michael Moore?

Anon 4:01,Thanks, I have all the spyware I need already. Nice ripoff of ABC though…

Moore and Coulter are selling stuff.They’re serious purveyors, not serious thinkers…I ignore both although Coulter certainly easier on the eyes then Moore.

The liberal equivalent of Coulter? There isn’t one. You can search high and low, and you won’t find anyone on the left who lies and slanders the way Coulter does and who enjoys mainstream respectability. Michael Moore? Come on. The guy is well within the range of sane (if harsh and sometimes factually shaky) political discourse. You’d almost need to hold up someone like Ward Churchill, whom no one would have even heard of if he weren’t regularly propped up by the right as an alleged example of the things liberals say. Or Noam Chomsky, who’s not exactly getting invites to mix it up with Matt Lauer on the “Today” show.

It seems the world is chock-full of people with flawed thinking. What have we come to? Can this bode well for the future of humanity? Let’s face it, Iraq HAD a plethora of weapons, and the whole world was misled into believing they were looking for fissionable material, and the UN wouldn’t act, so President Bush went in. When we arrived, the weapons had been hidden (underground or in the mountains), transported to some adjacent country, or sold. They still exist somewhere. The President did not lie.Sorry anonymous, I had a moment of patriotism; I ahouldn’t have been rude.

What Ann Coulter does or says doesn’t interest or concern me much. What concerns me is that a wide swath of Republicans embrace her slander and viciousness, and virtually all of the rest at least tolerate it. When have you heard a Republican speak up for ostracizing her? Her major achievement, such as it is, is to lay bare the ugly soul of today’s Republican Party.

hatlo wrote: “Let’s face it, Iraq HAD a plethora of weapons, and the whole world was misled into believing they were looking for fissionable material …”You left out … “misled by the Bush Administration.”It’s one thing to be a patriot. It’s quite another to knowingly deceive the American public in order to get the man who took a shot at your daddy.Feel any safer today? I don’t.

No, I’m not. I’m just a guy who recognizes that Bush knew Iraq didn’t have WMD and lied to the American people in order to get “his war.”