Why did the Celtics dump Jaylen Brown for pretty much nothing?

Jaylen Brown in Jakarta, Indonesia. 2018 public domain photo by State Dept. / Budi Sudarmo.

I usually reserve my semi-informed sports musings for Facebook. But that Celtics trade, with Jaylen Brown going to the 76ers for a few draft picks and a 36-year-old guy who’s hurt all the time, is just mind-boggling. How did we get from “We’ll trade Brown reluctantly if it gives us a chance to win a championship” to “We must dump Brown at any cost”?

The best-case scenario is that Brad Stevens is clearing the decks for a blockbuster move. The worst-case scenario? New owner Bill Chisholm comes from the world of private equity, and the one thing these guys know how to do is strip their businesses of assets before selling them off and moving on.

Sports journalist Howard Bryant put it this way on Threads: “Are the Celtics entering the John Y. Brown era of ownership?”

Stevens has proved to be bold and creative in recent years, so he deserves some time to show us what’s next. But if that’s all there is, the Celtics just gave away their second-best player, who also happens to be an interesting person and a leader in the Black community, for — nothing.

On second thought. Less than two weeks ago, the Celtics were willing to trade Brown for Giannis Antetokounmpo. It didn’t work out because of other players and draft picks, but you can’t say it would have been a contract dump. So I guess we should be willing to wait and see what Stevens might have up his sleeve.


Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Why did the Celtics dump Jaylen Brown for pretty much nothing?”

  1. Stevens can’t possibly have anything up his sleeve because he got no assets for a super star who has improved every season and is in his prime, a man who emerged as a true leader of a young team this past season. This ranks with the worst trades of all time.

Post a Comment. Real names, first and last, are recommended.