The Boston Globe has an ethical dilemma on its hands. Segun Oduolowu, who is the host of the Globe’s daily television newscast, “Boston Globe Today,” recently took part in a fundraising call for Vice President Kamala Harris and spoke enthusiastically on behalf of her presidential campaign.
But according to Jennifer Smith of CommonWealth Beacon, the newscast came under the control of the newsroom only recently, after the fundraiser, making it unclear whether Oduolowu violated the paper’s ethical guidelines.
Smith wrote that “the repercussions of his remarks are messy. The call was just two weeks before an internal email announced that the ‘Boston Globe Today’ show would be moving under newsroom control — likely subjecting it to a typical set of journalistic ethics rules.” (Disclosure: I’m a member of CommonWealth Beacon’s editorial advisory board.)
Oduolowu spoke for about seven minutes as part of an “African Diaspora for Harris-Walz” video event. Oduolowu’s remarks start here. Among other things, he said:
November 5, when you go to those polls, make the right decision for not just you, but the people who fought so hard for you to have that opportunity, to be in a call like this, to be in this country, to make that choice and put this woman in office…. I think the choice is simple.
Smith quoted a statement from the Globe that seems carefully worded to distance itself from Oduolowu’s actions without saying explicitly that he’d deviated from any ethical policy:
Boston Globe Media employees are expected to adhere to our company guidelines, standards, and policies which align with their role. In this case, the personal political comments made by an employee were their own and were not endorsed by or reflective of Boston Globe Media, nor were the comments shared via one of our products, platforms, or events.
Frankly, I’m confused. By all appearances, “Boston Globe Today” is an extension of the Globe’s journalism, presented as a newscast and frequently featuring interviews with Globe reporters.
But it does sound like any ambiguities are about to be eliminated, as Smith reports that editor Nancy Barnes sent an email to the staff on Sept. 10 announcing that “Boston Globe Today” would be moved “under the auspices of the newsroom.” The Harris-Walz call on which Oduolowu appeared took place on Aug. 26.
Discover more from Media Nation
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pretty straight forward to me. Unless somehow “Boston Globe Today” was unambiguously under the editorial department, it’s a violation of journalistic ethics and apparent conflict of interest at a minimum. Speaking as a journalist, unless you are overtly branded as an opinion personality, it’s clear. You can’t do this. It simply feeds the opponents/critics of media. In the current environment, journalists and media organizations have to be beyond reproach.
If a reporter/newscaster made a verbatim identical endorsement of Trump – would there be a delicate response or a trip to the unemployment office? The press must be objective, as they are needed to dam the ocean of party favoritism slowly drowning us all.
Cynthia, this is going to be a rare case of my agreeing with your what-about-ism. I don’t think Oduolowu would have been fired if he’d endorsed Trump, especially given this weird ambiguity over whether he is a Globe journalist or not. But I agree that it would have been a much bigger deal.