By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

Sports Illustrated, caught running AI content and author profiles, tries to deflect blame

Time-Life co-founder Henry Luce in 1954. Photo via the Library of Congress.

Fake journalism produced by artificial intelligence is quickly devolving into a fiasco. The latest scandal involves Sports Illustrated, once a great magazine that was part of the Time-Life empire, now — well, who knows? It’s owned by something called The Arena Group, whose holdings also include TheStreet and Parade magazine (remember them?), and whose website says the company “combines powerful brands, in areas consumers are passionate about and delivers compelling experiences.” Corporate gobbledygook perfected except for the misplaced comma.

On Monday, Maggie Harrison of Futurism reported that SI had published articles generated by AI and — get this — included bylines and writer profiles that also had been generated by AI. Fake writers producing fake stories, in other words. All we need are fake readers. Harrison wrote: “After we reached out with questions to the magazine’s publisher, The Arena Group, all the AI-generated authors disappeared from Sports Illustrated’s site without explanation.”

SI later posted a message on X/Twitter that almost literally says, No, we did not publish any AI content. What actually happened was that we published AI content. Huh? The message is worth reproducing in full:

We didn’t do it! The third-party content provider did it! Well, all right then. Poynter media analyst Tom Jones, himself a former sports writer, has a lot to say this morning. He does not seem impressed with The Arena Group’s attempt to deflect blame, writing, “The stories in question do not appear to be the traditional sports features we’re all familiar with when it comes to Sports Illustrated. The stories were more along the lines of product features and reviews. For example, one story from 2022 was about the best volleyballs. Not that it makes any difference.” No, it doesn’t.

The real threat coming from AI-produced fake journalism is that bottom-feeders with no interest in quality are going to load up on the stuff, thus harming the reputation of quality news organizations as well. NewsGuard recently conducted a study that found 49 content farms were using material that seemed to be “almost entirely written” by AI. Even in its shrunken form, Sports Illustrated is better than a content farm. Even so, Henry Luce is rolling over in his grave.

Leave a comment | Post comments

Previous

An outrage against the First Amendment in Alabama

Next

The Boston Herald checks in from the San Gabriel Valley bureau

5 Comments

  1. Plus, what’s a “pseudo name”? Isn’t it a “pseudonym”?!

  2. Bobby

    Wouldn’t this fake news affect gambling?

  3. Ned

    It’s literally the same bullsh** they pulled at Reviewed, with SI offering the same bullsh** deflections Gannett offered when THEY were called out about it.

  4. Jay Haitch

    I read an article somewhere a couple of years ago that said Sports Illustrated had basically closed and a company was maintaining the name and that it was going to be like National Lampoon – a trademarked name of a defunct organization that could be licensed to put on a low budget comedy movie to give it credibility – only with sports themed products. I noticed “it” still put out articles and looked at some every now and then when they showed up in search and got the idea it was something like Huffington Post when bloggers would write content.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén