By Dan Kennedy • The press, politics, technology, culture and other passions

Revered, yet today largely unheard: The life and career of Duke Ellington

Duke Ellington performs for patients Nov. 3, 1954, at the KFG Radio Studio for Fitzsimons Army Medical Center in Aurora, Colorado. (U.S. Army photo)

Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington and Charlie Parker are often described as the three founding giants of jazz. Parker’s music comes across as modern and accessible to those of us listening today, though too modern and inaccessible when he arrived in the 1940s. Armstrong seems like an artifact from the distant past. That leaves Ellington, generally regarded as one of the great geniuses of 20th-century music but not often heard anymore unless you seek him out.

I had long wanted to know more about Ellington and his music, so I recently listened to the audio version of Terry Teachout’s 2013 biography, “Duke: A Life of Duke Ellington.” I learned a lot. But I wish, instead, that I could have listened to a series of lectures with examples from Ellington’s music. A nearly 18-hour biography of a musician with no music felt like a lost opportunity. I also would have liked a more generous telling of the Duke’s life.

One aspect that especially impressed me was that — unlike Armstrong (the subject of an earlier Teachout biography) — Ellington was largely able to elude the racist stereotypes of the day. From the earliest years of his career, Ellington was presented as an artist who came about as close to transcending race as was possible at the time. (And no, it’s still not possible today.)

Part of it was because of his manager, Irving Mills, who deserves a great deal of credit even if he and Ellington eventually had a falling-out. (Among other things, Ellington discovered Mills had lied to him about how much he’d spent on a coffin for Ellington’s mother.) Part of it was because Ellington came from a middle-class Washington family with bourgeois aspirations; Ellington was ever-conscious of acting as a Black role model. And part of it, Teachout acknowledges, is that Ellington was light-skinned.

Become a member! For $5 a month, you can support Media Nation and receive a weekly newsletter with exclusive content. Just click here.

My problems with Teachout are three-fold. First, he dwells at excessive length on Ellington’s voracious sexual appetites. Second, he dwells at even more excessive length on Ellington’s habit of lifting what he’d heard from other musicians without giving credit. Music, and jazz in particular, is a collaborative art, and it seems to me that the point could be made without driving it home over and over. It has to be said, though, that Ellington went too far at times, so much so that he broke the heart of his closest collaborator, Billy Strayhorn.

Third, Teachout’s analysis of Ellington’s music strikes me as oftentimes pedantic and obscure. Teachout believes that Ellington’s genius was in making three-minute records, and that his longer pieces fell short because he had never studied the European classical composers to learn how it’s done. But is that really a fair criticism? Ellington was a Black composer working in an African American idiom. Maybe his longer pieces came out just the way he wanted them to.

Even so, I learned a lot. Right now I’m listening to “Never No Lament: The Blanton-Webster Band,” recorded between 1940 and ’42 and regarded as the height of Ellington’s career. And Teachout includes a lot of fascinating details, including Ellington’s receiving the Medal of Freedom from Richard Nixon at a White House reception at which Nixon sat at the piano and played “Happy Birthday” for the Duke.

In a New York Times review, James Gavin called “Duke” a “cleareyed reassessment of a man regarded in godlike terms.” Despite its flaws, I found it to be a valuable guide to a the life and work of a genius who, today, is known mainly for being well-known. It’s time to listen to Ellington anew.


Discover more from Media Nation

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Previous

Marty Baron, Walter Lippmann and the true meaning of objectivity

Next

The Globe will partner with the Portland Press Herald on a Spotlight reporting project

4 Comments

  1. Deborah Nam-Krane

    I didn’t realize people weren’t listening to Ellington. He’s one of my favorites! But maybe that’s the style of music I like?

    I just read a book this weekend — Range by David Epstein — that explained that Duke Ellington was pretty much a self-taught musician (the piano lessons he had at age 7 went nowhere), and that was the key to his innovative style. This holds for numerous great musicians, so Teachout’s criticism sounds like a reach.

    • Dan Kennedy

      Teachout actually is a big admirer of Ellington as a pianist and as a composer of three-minute pieces. I’d be curious to know what some other critics have had to say about his extended works.

  2. Ellington wrote extended compositions in every decade, starting with Symphony in Black in 1935, all the way through the Sacred Concerts, near the end of his life. My take is that critical opinion was divided when each of these long form pieces came out, but that with each passing decade, more critics have seen their merits.

  3. Dan: Wanted to let you know that my neighbor and friend Mark Harvey confirms your comments about Teachout. The Aardvard Jazz Orchestra (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aardvark_Jazz_Orchestra), which he founded in 1973, performs a good deal of Ellington or Harvey’s own work in the Duke’s spirit.

    Bob Sprague

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén