Listening to your audience

Howard Owens, publisher of The Batavian, a community news site in western New York, offers a useful lesson in listening to your audience.

On Friday, Owens posted a story about a couple who were arrested and charged with having sex on a picnic table at a public park. Both the 41-year-old woman and her 29-year-old paramour were charged with public lewdness. Weirdly, the woman, who is married and has children, was also charged with adultery.

Owens customarily publishes the names of every adult who is arrested. In this case, though, he named the man but not the woman, writing, “Because the woman is married with children, The Batavian has chosen to withhold her name.”

That led to a flood of comments, most of them from readers arguing that what was good for the man ought to be good enough for the woman as well. Owens, in turn, changed his mind and named the woman, writing:

After giving it much thought — listening to our critics, talking with Billie [his wife and business partner], considering previous cases — I’ve come to the conclusion that our decision Friday night not to publish the name was a mistake.

Never one to let an opportunity go to waste, Owens posted a poll question an hour and a half ago, asking, “When couples are caught in public having sex, should their names be released?” The results, as I write this: 68 percent “yes,” 15 percent “no,” 14 percent “maybe” and 3 percent “no opinion.” [Note: Results corrected as of 11:07 a.m.]

Given Owens’ policy of naming every person over 17 who is “arrested, detained or cited by local law enforcement when the name is released to the local media,” I think he made the right call.

Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

About these ads

11 thoughts on “Listening to your audience

  1. L.K. Collins

    So 16% voted for something other than yes, no, or no opinion?

    Interesting poll results.

  2. Bob Gardner

    Most important, they identified the picnic table and published a picture of it, apparently, so people could eat somewhere else.

  3. Neil Sagan

    If the amorous couple cleaned the picnic table, and no citizen filed a complaint about their illegal public behavior, shouldn’t the couple be allowed to screw under the sun just as the other animals do?

    Regarding the editors decisions, whatever… yeah its funny.

    1. Dan Kennedy Post author

      @Howard: More interesting than outdoor sex on a picnic table? I’m impressed.

  4. Brad Deltan

    Dude, if you want a public picnic table that’s never once been a location for sex, you’re gonna be looking for a long, long time.

    People can and do have sex everywhere.

  5. Bill Hanna

    I may be in the minority here, but I say let these people alone. As long as they’re not on the picnic table when I set my basket down, who cares? Report the real news, which this isn’t.

Comments are closed.