Sean Murphy retires from the Globe, ending a family connection of more than 60 years

Sean Murphy (via LinkedIn)

More than 60 years of Boston Globe history is coming to an end. Sean P. Murphy, a reporter at the paper since 1987, is retiring. His father, Jeremiah V. Murphy, was a reporter and columnist at the Globe, and the earliest byline I could find for him dates back to 1961. That’s quite a stretch of time.

Sean Murphy has worked in a variety of reporting and editing jobs at the Globe, serving in recent years as the consumer advocate reporter. His column, “The Fine Print,” is popular and widely read. In a message to the newsroom shared with me by a trusted source, Murphy said in part:

There is no more honorable work than what we do. It is vital to our way of life, our well-being, our democracy, our systems of government and justice and business, our decency. Every morning, I spend a significant amount of time reading all sections of the noble Boston Globe. (At this stage of my life, I begin reading before dawn, sipping my one cup of coffee of the day, classical music in the background.) The Globe informs me, amuses me, fortifies me. For many years, I have been a part-time college instructor in media law. [Murphy earned a law degree from Suffolk University.] I tell my students there is no better investment than the cost of the Boston Globe. “Start a relationship with the Globe,” I say. “Read it every day. It will pay huge dividends.” Hurrah for every one of you, and for those who have gone before us at the Globe.

Business editor Greg Huang and assistant business editor Tim Logan wrote:

Sean was adamant (annoyingly so) that we not sing his praises or go through his lengthy list of achievements here. So we won’t mention that his “Fine Print” column built a large and dedicated readership over the past nine years, winning well over a million dollars back to mistreated consumers from corporations, landlords, and even the state. Or that his wide experience as a courts reporter, investigative reporter, city editor, and other roles at the Globe helped inform how this department, for one, handles its business. Or, more importantly, how his advice, mentorship, and friendship have influenced generations of journalists for the better.

Sean, we will miss you more than we can say. You are irreplaceable, we all know that. We also know you will stay connected. Thanks for all you’ve done. Below are Sean’s parting words to the room.

Our paths did not intersect much over the years, although I do recall that we were on a panel together in Gloucester a few years ago. I can also report that a graduate student in my opinion journalism class, Alexa Gagosz, who took Sean’s media law class at Suffolk University when she was an undergraduate, used to rave about his consumer column as an ideal blend of reporting and opinion. (Sean earned a law degree at Suffolk.) Alexa is now a star reporter for the Globe’s Rhode Island edition.

Congratulations to Sean, and best wishes for a long and satisfying retirement.

A sickening tale of abuse

Kudos to Boston Globe reporter Sean Murphy, who has produced a stomach-churning two-part series (part one; part two) on the phenomenally expensive health-insurance plans that are routinely given to public employees in Massachusetts.

Appalled as I am that state and local employees are having as much as 90 percent of the health-care costs covered by taxpayers, that really pales in comparison to those receiving free health care for serving a few years in part-time, mostly voluntary elected positions.

I’d like to see newspapers and bloggers in every city and town in the follow up by reporting exactly what the situation is in their community.

Sean Murphy responds to Totten

Boston Globe reporter Sean Murphy, who was the prosecutor in the Boston Newspaper Guild’s ouster of president — now former president — Dan Totten, spoke with me a little while ago. Murphy is highly critical of remarks Totten made in an e-mail reported yesterday by the Boston Herald’s Jessica Heslam. Says Murphy:

All I want to say is that this was a prosecution, not a persecution. Mr. Totten was not the victim of a political vendetta. He was a victim of his own bad conduct. I was asked to be the prosecutor and agreed to do so. It was done by the book. There was no personal animosity. Any suggestion otherwise is false. Any suggestion that I was biased is false. I was well known to be a “no” vote on both contract proposals, which was in line with the position of Mr. Totten. I did not participate in any recall efforts. I was known to eschew recall.

Murphy adds that, though he did attend a meeting to discuss Totten’s possible removal, Totten “knows full well I expressed great skepticism.”

I asked Murphy whether there has been any talk about whether the accusations made against Totten by the union could result in the involvement of law enforcement. Murphy’s response: “I have not broached that subject nor has anybody in my presence.”

Earlier coverage.