Many police departments in Central Massachusetts violate the law when asked to produce public police-log records, according to an investigation by the Worcester Sunday Telegram. Some flat-out refused. Others demanded identification in violation of the law, and three even went so far as to run a database check on the person requesting the records, the paper reports.
“The law is clear,” the story begins. “Police departments must keep and update a daily log of their activities, reported crimes and arrests, and that log must be readily available to the public at no cost and with no questions asked.”
This interactive graphic provides a quick overview as to which police departments were in compliance and which weren’t.
Any of us who has worked in journalism knows that some police departments cooperate only with reporters they know and trust, despite the state public-records law, which requires them to produce records pertaining to incidents and people who’ve been arrested.
Police departments are not required to produce detailed incident reports about pending investigations.
Whenever I’ve sent students out to obtain police-log records, the results have been mixed. Boston Police, whose headquarters is a short walk from the Northeastern campus, was so accustomed to student requests that they’d form a virtual welcoming committee, giving them everything they needed before they were even asked. I eventually had to require that students visit other police departments — Boston was making it too easy.
But some police departments in Greater Boston were so uncooperative that my students were unable to complete the assignment unless they returned two or three times.
Media lawyer Jonathan Albano, a member of the board of directors of the Northeastern-affiliated New England First Amendment Coalition, tells the Telegram:
This shows why you need the public records law. People in those positions worry about if it’s all right or not to give someone this public information. After a while, they start to think of it as their information and that it’s their job to protect it.
The Telegram’s investigation also demonstrates the dangers of what happens when the police become a law unto themselves.
Discover more from Media Nation
Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.
Rick Peterson
It’s not just about the police; it’s about transparency in government generally. Back in the early 80’s, a real estate broker’s trip to the City of Boston Assessor’s Office to get ownership info on a property would be met with “why, what’s it to you?” Howie Carr tells the story about how the property assessments in Somerville were recorded at City Hall in pencil in those days. Plenty of people had plenty to hide, as history has borne out.
Dan Kennedy
@Rick: For what it’s worth, my students have had zero problem at City Hall; those who have decided to go to other city or town halls have had no problems, either.
Rick Peterson
@Dan:awareness of the issue is much better today than it was 30 years ago. Those federal indictments during the White administration had a salutary effect on attitudes as well, most would agree.
Patricia Daukantas
I liked that interactive graphic with the mouse-over information (and not just because I was born and raised in one of the communities marked “green”). Any particular suburban Boston towns that should be marked red in such a map?
Aaron Read
Ouch.
http://www.stateintegrity.org/massachusetts
Massachusetts Overall Grade = C (74)
“Public Access to Information = F”
“State Budget Processes = F”
“Ethics Enforcement Agencies = C-”
Frankly, the only reason Mass scored as high as it did was an “A” for “Redistricting”, which is a joke since Mass consistently votes on a party line anyways, and on Beacon Hill at least, it’s a one-party state. Pretty much for Capitol Hill, too, Scott Brown notwithstanding.