
David Brooks speaking at the Kennedy School. Photo by Lauren Schaad. Original in the Storify referenced below.
New York Times columnist David Brooks ripped into the Republican Party for failing to come to grips with a country whose diversity is on the rise. The Republicans, he said Thursday evening at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, were “a lagging indicator” in the demographic changes that have taken place over the past several decades, and that helped shape the election results last week.
Brooks delivered the Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics, an annual program presented by the Kennedy Schools’ Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. His talk was precededed by the presentation of the David Nyhan Prize for Political Journalism to Atlanta Journal-Constitution columnist Cynthia Tucker.
A lot of people were live-tweeting the event, and the Shorenstein Center put together a Storify that you can read by clicking here. My own tweets follow.
At Shorenstein for Theodore White lecture. Alex Jones is about to bestow the David Nyhan Award for
Political Joirnalism.—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Nyhan Award for Political Journalism goes to Cynthia Tucker.—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
Cynthia Tucker: Many older white voters “seem terrified” by “the browning of America.”—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
Cynthia Tucker: “I never met a child who chose to be born to a poor single mother.”—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks is about to deliver the Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics.” I’ll hashtag it #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Demographic shift nothing new. Republican Party is “a lagging indicator.” #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Harvard embraced diversity in 1950s in a way that Republicans still haven’t. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: “One of the lessons of this election is the Obama Harvard beat the Romney Harvard.” #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Asians and Latinos share “a ferocious commitment to work” with high regard for government. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Republican Party more of a drag on Romney than vice-versa. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Democrats are stuck with consequences of aging society and economic stagnation. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Obama is “right on the merits” regarding budget, but needs a deal to solve deficit. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Obama is cautious but not Burkean because he has “a strong faith in central planning.” #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks says when he worked for Buckley, National Review was conservative but not Republican. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks can play the conservative with a Harvard crowd, but we all know he’s a classic centrist. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 15, 2012
David Brooks: Conservatives understand liberals better than liberals understand conservatives. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks: 2012 was the worst campaign he’s covered. Nasty. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks: Recently interviewed 4th most conservative senator. His fear? A primary challenge from the right. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks: “My view right now is we have two minority parties.” People vote for who they hate least. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks singled out Asians and Latinos because Republicans see them as groups they should have. Not racism. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks is back. Says the criticism that bothers Obama the most is from people on left who say he’s weak. #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012
David Brooks: Republicans will evolve on gay marriage “only by the hearse.” #shorenstein—
Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) November 16, 2012


Brooks must be right about liberals not understanding conservatives. For instance, when he says “Obama is “right on the merits” regarding budget, but needs a deal to solve deficit.” I don’t understand why conservatives get to run up the deficit for 30 years, but it’s the responsibility of Democrats to “solve” it. Can some conservative explain that to me?
Ok, Steve, let it go unsolved.
That’s a real constructive answer.
So Dan, how do you feel about the process of tweeting an event? I do it occasionally, but honestly, I find it really distracting to try and formulate the statement to editorial standards. I’m always anxious that I’m missing something important while tweeting.
@Rachel: Good question. Done properly, it can form the basis of notes for a longer story. But, like you, I feel I’m missing something. Since I was at the event, I didn’t have my laptop, and I go much more slowly on my iPhone than I do on my laptop, so that might have been better. I also think you can get better notes by live-blogging than by live-tweeting, but the cool kids aren’t doing that anymore.